NBA 2KTV host says Rockstar asked her to confirm a console for a GTA 6 copy

NBA 2KTV host Alexis Morgan says Rockstar Games emailed her to confirm which console she uses for a copy of GTA 6. Her public post is real and her work on 2K's basketball show places her inside the wider Take-Two ecosystem, but she did not publish the email, identify a delivery date or say that she already has the game. The claim therefore remains a rumor about outreach to one recipient, not confirmation of a broader review-copy campaign.

GTA 6 WATCH VISUAL

What Alexis Morgan actually said

Morgan wrote: ‘Just got an email asking me to confirm my console for a copy of GTA 6, thank you,’ and tagged Rockstar Games. The post identifies a claimed request and its subject, but it does not say that the copy has arrived. It also does not specify PlayStation 5 or Xbox Series X|S, whether the copy would be physical or digital, or when it would be delivered.

Why her 2K connection matters — and where it stops

Morgan is known as a host of NBA 2KTV, placing her alongside a franchise published by 2K under the same Take-Two corporate umbrella as Rockstar. That relationship provides a plausible route for promotional coordination. It is not independent corroboration of the email, and it does not make Morgan a Rockstar spokesperson or turn her personal post into an official distribution announcement.

A platform check is a logistics step, not an early copy

Confirming a recipient's console is a routine prerequisite when a publisher manages limited physical stock or platform-specific codes. The request can happen well before fulfilment. Without a dispatch notice, code, embargo or access date, the post cannot support claims that reviewers already have GTA 6, that reviews are close or that selected creators will play before launch.

What would move the story beyond rumor

A visible message from a verifiable Rockstar address, an official recipient program, corroborating accounts from independently identifiable outlets or a Rockstar statement would materially strengthen the claim. Even then, each piece of evidence would need to distinguish a promised launch copy from access to a pre-release build. None of that documentation is public at the time of writing.